Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495211›Full record

ReviewNature chemistry2026

Molecular systems engineering of synthetic cells.

Marcus Fletcher, Bradley Diggines, Yuval Elani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcus FletcherDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Bradley DigginesDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Yuval ElaniDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. y.elani@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9603-2490

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/W00125X/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/Z514895/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/S023518/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building synthetic versions of biological cells from the bottom up offers an unprecedented opportunity to understand the rules of life and harness cellular capabilities in biotechnology. Whereas substantial progress has been made in recapitulating elementary cell functions, we argue that accelerating the engineering of synthetic cells requires a shift in research practices. The dominant approach-rationally designing and integrating functional modules-becomes restrictive when dealing with the massively complex biochemical pathways associated with life, especially when design principles remain unclear. We advocate moving away from theoretical rational design towards a data-driven model that is centred on library generation. Inspired by a systems chemistry perspective, this strategy prioritizes the systematic creation and distribution of composition-function libraries. To enable this, experimental strategies must integrate high-throughput synthetic cell generation, automation and closed-feedback control of workflows. Broad adoption will also require greater emphasis on quantitative benchmarking, and the de-skilling of techniques, supporting effective laboratory-to-laboratory collaboration.

Indexed as

Artificial CellsCell EngineeringSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.