ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing critical care pharmacotherapy: dynamic prospective evaluation of the medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score in critically ill patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Data-Driven Medication Regimen Complexity Score for Critically Ill Patients: MRC-ICU 2.0.Pharmacotherapy · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medication regimens in critically ill patients are generally complex, increasing the risk of drug-related problems (DRPs) and unfavorable outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate associations between medication complexity and clinical pharmacist (CP) interventions as well as clinical outcomes using the Medication Regimen Complexity-Intensive Care Unit (MRC-ICU) scoring tool. This prospective cohort study was conducted between June 2024 and April 2025 in a medical ICU of a tertiary university hospital. Throughout the study period, medication regimen complexity was assessed daily. CP interventions were systematically documented, and their potential impact was evaluated using the Clinical, Economic and Organizational (CLEO) tool. A total of 202 patients over 2,287 patient-days were evaluated, during which 748 CP interventions were performed. The number of identified DRPs and CP interventions was significantly higher in patients with high MRC-ICU scores (≥ 8) (p < 0.001), among whom interventions with a moderate clinical impact (p < 0.001) and cost-decreasing economic impact (p = 0.002) were also more frequently observed. The MRC-ICU score at 24 h correlated with the number of CP interventions (r = 0.554; p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed each one-point increase in the MRC-ICU score at 24 h was associated with a 3.9% increase in the number of CP interventions [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.039; p < 0.001]. According to the patient-day analysis, each one-point increase in the daily MRC-ICU score was associated with an 8.4% increase in daily interventions (IRR: 1.084; p < 0.001). Additionally, strong correlations were observed between the MRC-ICU score and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) (r = 0.618), the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (r = 0.720), and the Modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) (r = 0.614) (for all p < 0.001). Furthermore, the MRC-ICU score demonstrated good predictive performance for ICU mortality, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813. The MRC-ICU score stands out not only as a tool to evaluate regimen complexity but also as a valuable and dynamic instrument for predicting the need for CP interventions, supporting patient prioritization, and integrating with clinical risk scoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.