ArticleScientific reports2026
Design and evaluation of a knowledge-based ECG noise filtering framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are widely used for cardiac monitoring but are often affected by noise that degrades signal quality. Conventional preprocessing applies the same filters regardless of noise level, which can distort clean segments. We introduce a noise-presence framework that identifies whether noise is present, determines its type and then applies filtering suited to the specific contamination. This approach aims to reduce unnecessary distortion and preserve clinically important features. We evaluate the framework by measuring changes in QT and QRS intervals under noise-agnostic, noise-presence and noise-profile filtering. We also examine how sampling frequency influences noise detection and classification using kernel density estimation (KDE) and find that 500 Hz offers the best performance. A hierarchical Adaboost model outperforms support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and ExtraTree classifiers, reaching [Formula: see text] accuracy in noise detection and [Formula: see text] in noise classification across seven datasets. Noise-profile filtering achieves the smallest mean QT difference at 2.50 ms compared with noise-presence at [Formula: see text] ms and noise-agnostic filtering at [Formula: see text] ms. QRS differences improve from [Formula: see text] ms with noise-agnostic filtering to [Formula: see text] ms with noise-presence and 4.28 ms with noise-profile filtering. The results show that adapting the filtering strategy to noise presence and type offers clear advantages in preserving clinical ECG parameters, which supports more reliable interval measurements in diagnostic settings. The main limitation is that the model is trained with synthetic noise, which may not capture the full range of real-world artefacts. This limitation remains, but the framework is still suitable for portable ECG systems and can be extended to other physiological signals by retraining on data from the target modality. The results indicate that adapting the filtering strategy to noise presence and type provides clear benefits in preserving clinical ECG parameters, supporting more reliable interval measurements in diagnostic settings. While the model was trained using synthetic noise, which may not fully represent all real-world artefacts, this does not diminish its practical applicability. The framework remains well-suited for portable ECG systems and can be extended to other physiological signals by retraining on data from the target modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.