Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Biodegradation of insecticide residue by lactic acid bacteria.

K Kiruthika, A Suganthi, R Anandham, Y S Johnson Thangaraj Edward, P Renukadevi, M Murugan, Bimal Kumar Sahoo, Mohammad Ikram, J Kousika, M Alagar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

K KiruthikaDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
A SuganthiDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India. suganthi.a@tnau.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7013-4459
R AnandhamDepartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Y S Johnson Thangaraj EdwardDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
P RenukadeviDepartment of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
M MuruganDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Bimal Kumar SahooDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Mohammad IkramDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
J KousikaDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
M AlagarDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistence of insecticide residues on food crops poses a significant risk to human health and the environment, necessitating effective residue mitigation strategies. This study evaluates the potential of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains, Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, for degrading residues of cyantraniliprole and chlorantraniliprole under laboratory conditions, and further assessed their degradation potential for cyantraniliprole under field conditions. Residue levels were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, allowing precise measurement of degradation rates. In minimal broth, both strains reduced cyantraniliprole residues up to 33.07% and chlorantraniliprole residues by up to 23.44% over 12 days, with Lactobacillus pentosus demonstrating a higher degradation efficiency. Nutrient broth significantly enhanced biodegradation efficiency, with both LAB strains removing more than 98% of cyantraniliprole within 4 days and achieving complete degradation by 10th day. Controlled field evaluation demonstrated the practical efficacy of LAB application, where Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactococcus lactis reduced insecticide residues by up to 40.99 and 34.52% respectively, after 8 h of spraying. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of LAB as a natural, eco-friendly solution for mitigating pesticide residues in food commodities, contributing to sustainable agricultural practices.

Indexed as

InsecticidesLactobacillalesLactobacillusLactococcus lactisPesticide ResiduesBiodegradation, Environmentalortho-AminobenzoatesTandem Mass SpectrometrychlorantranilipoleInsecticidesortho-AminobenzoatesPesticide ResiduesDegradationDiamideLactobacillus pentosusLactococcus lactisResidue

Identifiers

PMID41495143
PMCPMC12868869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.