ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting carbonation depth in fiber-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete (FR-UHPC) using state-of-the-art machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbonation-induced degradation is one of the leading causes of durability loss in concrete structures. Despite advances in conventional concrete carbonation models, predictive models for fiber-reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete (FR-UHPC) remain scarce, given its complex, multiscale behavior. This study presents a new and data-driven analytical framework for predicting the carbonation depth of FR-UHPC using advanced machine learning techniques, including neural operators for modeling physical systems (NOMPS), artificial intelligence-based pipeline search for regression (AIPSR), quantum machine learning (QML), and explainable AI using quantum shapley values (EAIQSV). Analysis of 800 experimental data points identified curing time, temperature, and silica fume content as key determinants of carbonation depth. The models were validated through rigorous statistical analysis and 5-fold cross-validation, with AIPSR outperforming the other models in terms of prediction accuracy (R² = 0.83) and consistency. This framework provides a robust and repeatable method for predicting carbonation in FR-UHPC, while improving interpretability and incorporating quantum-inspired machine learning techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.