ArticleScientific reports2026
Temporal patterns of bruxism behaviors: multiple day recording with portable electromyography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibacterial PET-G/ZnO Composites: A New Approach to Relaxation Splint Materials in the Treatment of Bruxism.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Instrumental assessment of the association between sleep and awake bruxism in a general dental practice.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess inter-day variabilities and define temporal patterns of awake and sleep muscular activity during 72 h of continuous electromyographic (EMG) recording. 20 subjects used a portable EMG device for 72 h. Additional to the variables supplied by the instrument's algorithm, the number of grinding and of clenching episodes, per each hour of wakefulness and each hour of sleep, was counted. Number of grinding and clenching of episodes, per hour of sleep and wakefulness, were used in a mixed model analysis. For sleep grinding episodes, a linear temporal model showed a day-to-day increase indicating progressive elevation in grinding activity across measurement nights. For sleep clenching episodes, a basic model revealed a day-to-day increase and a linear decline across sleep hours. For awake grinding episodes, a linear temporal model revealed an hourly decline in grinding episodes, indicating decreased grinding activity throughout waking hours. No significant day-to-day variation was observed. For awake clenching episodes, a polynomial model revealed curvilinear patterns for both hourly and daily variations. Three days might be the minimum viable EMG monitoring period for comprehensive bruxism assessment. The distinct temporal signatures between sleep and awake bruxism, and between grinding and clenching, support the need for differentiated monitoring protocols. Standardization regarding EMG variables and minimum recording period should be considered for future studies. The complex temporal patterns of bruxism require multi-day observation to capture clinically meaningful patterns. Single-day assessments might miss critical temporal dynamics and underestimate the condition's severity and variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.