ArticleScientific reports2026
Robust neural decoding with low-density EEG.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-density Electroencephalography (EEG) recording enhances spatial resolution for neural signal decoding, yet the relationship between electrode density and decoding performance remains unclear. To address this, we systematically investigated decoding accuracy across electrode configurations of varying densities (16, 32, 64, 96, and 128 electrodes) using visual grating stimuli characterized by orientation, contrast, spatial frequency, and color. As expected, decoding accuracy increased with electrode density. Remarkably, however, reliable above-chance decoding was still achieved with as few as 16 electrodes, highlighting the robustness of decodable neural signals. To test the generalization of these results to more complex natural stimuli, we conducted a similar analysis with a diverse set of naturalistic images categorizable into living/non-living and moving/non-moving. The results consistently showed that effective decoding persists even with a 16-electrode configuration, showing robust decoding efficacy even for complex naturalistic stimuli. These findings demonstrate both the benefits of higher-density EEG and the robustness of neural decoding under sparse spatial sampling, providing new insights into how efficiently and broadly neural signals can be decoded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.