ArticleScientific reports2026
Fast and accurate prediction of adsorption energy of AgPd nanoalloys by deep learning potentials and neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate prediction of adsorption energy plays a crucial role in the design of efficient catalysts. However, the high-throughput prediction of adsorption energies based on first-principles methods presents significant challenges, hindering the rapid acceleration of catalyst development. In this study, a dataset of F atom adsorption energies was constructed, consisting of 1087 adsorption configurations on AgPd clusters, using the Ag-Pd-F deep learning potential. We employed four distinct deep neural network architectures, namely, Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (CGCNN), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM), and Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP), to establish an accurate predictive model for F atom adsorption on 38-atom AgPd nanoclusters. Among the models tested, the CGCNN, based on deep learning potentials, demonstrated the highest accuracy and provided the best uncertainty estimates, achieving an R² of 0.8379 and an RMSE of 0.1036 eV on the test set. This approach not only outperformed the other models in terms of predictive precision but also offered superior computational speed and cost-efficiency. The findings highlight the potential of deep learning models, particularly deep learning potentials, in predicting adsorption energies of nanoclusters, paving the way for accelerated material design and performance prediction in catalysis and materials science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.