ArticleScientific reports2026
Rank charged system search algorithm for optimization and operations research.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experimental Characterization of Emergent Behavior in Bio-Inspired Swarm Intelligence Algorithms.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce CSSRank, an improved version of the charged system search (CSS) algorithm, designed to address complex optimization problems more efficiently. CSSRank integrates a rank-based reduction selection strategy to enhance exploitation by progressively reducing the number of charged particles used in electric force calculations. To further balance exploration and exploitation, a ranking-based mutation strategy is incorporated, promoting diversity in early iterations and precision in later stages. We evaluated CSSRank on a set of standard benchmark functions and compared its performance with the original CSS algorithm. In addition, CSSRank was tested on two major benchmark suites, CEC 2014 and CEC 2024, and compared against a wide range of state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms. The results show that CSSRank outperforms many existing methods on CEC 2014 and performs competitively and close to the best-performing algorithms on CEC 2024, demonstrating both robustness and scalability. For real-world applications, CSSRank was applied to six UCI clustering datasets, where it consistently achieved higher clustering accuracy and more reliable objective values than baseline methods. It was also tested on three complex reservoir operation optimization problems, yielding superior engineering solutions with high reliability, and contributing to improvements in operational cost and resource efficiency. These results confirm the effectiveness, versatility, and reliability of CSSRank across both theoretical and practical optimization tasks, positioning it as a strong candidate for solving complex problems in optimization and operations research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.