Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495088›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An audit of corporate decarbonisation ambition against low carbon futures.

Iain Weaver, Jesse F Abrams, Jack Oliver, Nikolaos Dimakis, Andrew Parry, Timothy M Lenton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iain WeaverGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Northcote House, Streatham Campus, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK. i.s.weaver@exeter.ac.uk.
Jesse F AbramsGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Northcote House, Streatham Campus, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK.
Jack OliverGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Northcote House, Streatham Campus, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK.
Nikolaos DimakisJ O Hambro Capital Management, Level 3, 1 St James's Market, London, SW1Y 4AH, UK.
Andrew ParryJ O Hambro Capital Management, Level 3, 1 St James's Market, London, SW1Y 4AH, UK.
Timothy M LentonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Northcote House, Streatham Campus, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration has been steadily increasing since the 19th century, causing global warming. Despite efforts to reduce emissions, current projections anticipate a significant increase in global surface temperature by the end of the century, which may push us beyond a safe and just operating space. We must develop emissions pathways that consider renewable technology innovation, climate policy development and consumer behaviour change. In this manuscript we assess corporate emissions reduction ambition in the context of reduction pathways, and in doing so show that company reporting has reached a scale and quality that it can be used to supplement global emissions forecasting. We find emissions disclosures of target-setting companies to account for roughly 20% of global [Formula: see text] emissions and 60% of global market capitalisation. Of these, we find near-term targets to be consistent with the aggressive reduction requirements of the divergent net-zero scenario published by the Network for Greening the Financial System, but commitments to 2050 are lacking. There is a large disparity between the total market capitalisation of disclosing companies and the total emissions they cover, a disconnect which we emphasise must be addressed by future policy.

Identifiers

PMID41495088
PMCPMC12783815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.