ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-generated artwork detection using self-distilled transformers with global-local feature learning and Grad-CAM interpretability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a strong framework for the detection of artificial intelligence-generated artwork using digital imaging and deep learning-based transformers models, which helps in art community to distinguish the authenticity of human-created art from highly fascinated machine-generated content. Art holds reflection of deep cultural, historical, and social significance, however, due to rapid advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly in generative adversarial networks and diffusion models, have enabled the production of visually creating artworks that blur the boundaries between originality and synthesis. Traditional methods relying on conventional features and statistical analysis are increasingly lower performance against such advance transformation, highlighting the need for more advanced detection mechanisms. To address this challenge, the proposed approach employs Distillation with No Labels (DINO) v2, a self-distilled transformer model that excels in extracting discriminative features by capturing both global structures and fine-grained visual cues. The model was trained and evaluated on a balanced dataset of real and AI-generated art images, with results benchmarked against strong baselines. Experimental findings demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves 99.01% accuracy, 95.29% precision, 94.58% recall, 94.93% F1-score, and an AUC of 99%, outperforming all baselines with superior generalization. Furthermore, interpretability methods along with statistical validation based on log of p-values, confirmed that predictions are both dependable and transparent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.