Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495071›Full record

ReviewNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2026

Predicting probiotic success: lessons from Oxalobacter and oxalate metabolism.

Mangesh Suryavanshi, Sromona D Mukherjee, Aaron W Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mangesh SuryavanshiDepartment of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sromona D MukherjeeDepartment of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Aaron W MillerDepartment of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. millera25@ccf.org.

Funding

The role of acetogenic, methanogenic, and sulfate-reducing bacteria in oxalate metabolism and hyperoxaluriaR01DK121689 · NIDDK · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI MILLER, AARON W · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121689NIH NIDDK R01KD121689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota influences host metabolism, immunity, and organ physiology, making it an attractive therapeutic target. However, clinical probiotic trials often produce inconsistent results, reflecting context-dependent effects shaped by metabolic, ecological, dietary, and host-specific factors. We critically synthesized the literature on hyperoxaluria, a condition of elevated urinary oxalate associated with kidney stones and chronic kidney disease, as a mechanistically tractable model for probiotic development. We examined evidence from clinical studies, microbiome analyses, and mechanistic experiments to identify factors influencing efficacy, with a focus on Oxalobacter formigenes, a specialist oxalate-degrading anaerobe. Across trials, probiotic success depended less on dose, strain identity, or persistence, and more on the ecological context - particularly the baseline abundance of oxalate-degrading genes (oxc, frc) in the native microbiota. Efficacy was highest when these metabolic niches were vacant. Diet, delivery format, and broader microbial community structure also shaped outcomes. A taxon-centric approach is insufficient for predicting probiotic efficacy. We propose a three-phase framework for rational design: (1) case-control microbiome studies to identify metabolically relevant deficits; (2) mechanistic in vivo and in vitro validation to establish causality; and (3) complex systems modeling to predict context-specific responses. This metabolism-first, ecology-grounded strategy is generalizable to other microbiota-linked conditions and supports precision microbial therapeutics.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHyperoxaluriaOxalatesOxalobacter formigenesProbioticsAnimalsHumansOxalates

Identifiers

PMID41495071
PMCPMC12855262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.