Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495060›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A Dataset Showing a Century of Evolution in the Complexity of the United States Legal Code.

Dawoon Jeong, James Holehouse, Jisung Yoon, Christopher P Kempes, Geoffrey B West, Hyejin Youn

Abstract readDatasetHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dawoon Jeong *Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
James Holehouse *Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA. jamesholehouse1@gmail.com.
Jisung YoonKDI School of Public Policy and Management, Sejong-si, South Korea.
Christopher P KempesSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
Geoffrey B WestSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
Hyejin YounSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA. h.youn@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-4412

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2024S1A5C3A02042671NSF | BIO | Division of Emerging Frontiers (EF) 2133863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As societies confront increasingly complex regulatory demands in domains such as digital governance, climate policy, and public health, there is a pressing need to understand how legal systems evolve, where they concentrate regulatory attention, and how their institutional architectures shape capacity for adaptation. Yet, the long-term structural dynamics of law remain empirically underexplored. Here, we provide a quantitative analysis of the United States Code (U.S. Code), the primary compilation of federal statutory law in the United States, covering the entire history of the Code from 1926 to 2023. We include statistics related to the structural and linguistic complexity of the Code: word counts, vocabulary statistics, hierarchical organization (titles, chapters, sections, subsections), and cross-references among titles. Additionally, we make the generative AI method utilized to clean the old OCR versions of the U.S. Code publicly available. The dataset offers an empirical foundation for large-scale and long-term interdisciplinary analysis of the growth, reorganization, and internal logic of statutory systems. The dataset is released on GitHub with comprehensive documentation to support reuse across legal studies, data science, complexity research, and institutional analysis.

Identifiers

PMID41495060
PMCPMC12780074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.