ArticleScientific data2026
A Dataset Showing a Century of Evolution in the Complexity of the United States Legal Code.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dataset Showing a Century of Evolution in the Complexity of the United States Legal Code.Scientific data · 2026Article
- The power of Network Pluralism: multi-perspective modeling of heterogeneous legal document networks.The European physical journal. B · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As societies confront increasingly complex regulatory demands in domains such as digital governance, climate policy, and public health, there is a pressing need to understand how legal systems evolve, where they concentrate regulatory attention, and how their institutional architectures shape capacity for adaptation. Yet, the long-term structural dynamics of law remain empirically underexplored. Here, we provide a quantitative analysis of the United States Code (U.S. Code), the primary compilation of federal statutory law in the United States, covering the entire history of the Code from 1926 to 2023. We include statistics related to the structural and linguistic complexity of the Code: word counts, vocabulary statistics, hierarchical organization (titles, chapters, sections, subsections), and cross-references among titles. Additionally, we make the generative AI method utilized to clean the old OCR versions of the U.S. Code publicly available. The dataset offers an empirical foundation for large-scale and long-term interdisciplinary analysis of the growth, reorganization, and internal logic of statutory systems. The dataset is released on GitHub with comprehensive documentation to support reuse across legal studies, data science, complexity research, and institutional analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.