Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Shanshan Mo *State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Ruonan Wang *State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Zhongyi JianState Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Mingwei LiuState Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Feiyi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Zhun DengState Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7623-7705
Wenbo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Yanlian YangCAS Key Laboratory of Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4318-7672
Chen WangCAS Key Laboratory of Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-9089
Lanlan YuState Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China. yull@ibms.pumc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-5981
Mingzhan WangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Center of Super-Diamond and Advanced Films (COSDAF), City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China. mwang552@cityu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-9769
Chenxuan WangState Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biophysics and Structural Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China. wangcx@ibms.pumc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-7908
Funding
Beijing Nova Program 20240484521National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32201243National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32471451National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 92353302
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
β-Strand motifs are essential recognition modules in protein-protein interactions (PPIs), which govern cellular signaling networks and regulate molecular pathway dynamics. Herein we present an unexpected discovery of a previously uncharacterized β-strand insertion mechanism termed as cross-β-strand linking, wherein β-strands within the β-sheet-rich aggregates form inter-β-sheet connections through insertion into adjacent β-sheets. These cross-β-strand linkers comprise <15% of the total β-strands in the amyloidogenic aggregates, but they can mediate a significant proportion of intermolecular interactions, operating as dynamic molecular adapters that regulate the inter-β-sheet packing geometry. Crucially, these linkers exist as conformational ensembles of heterogeneous substates, bestowing remarkable structural diversity to the aggregates. Through promiscuous engagement with multiple conformational substates, cross-β-strand linkers enable the aggregates to balance order and disorder. In this work, we provide a perspective on how low-abundance structural elements can orchestrate complex molecular architectures in assembly systems.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Atypical β-strand insertion mediates the noncovalent cross-linking in amyloid aggregates. · full record | OpenQuestion