ArticleThe oncologist2026
Real-world outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy plus sintilimab and bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune escape in portal vein tumor thrombus: an intravascular tumor-immune niche framework for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSintilimab plus bevacizumab (Sin + Bev) is recommended as a first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT); however, its efficacy remains limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with Sin + Bev for HCC with PVTT. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 69 HCC patients with PVTT treated at two centers in China from August 2021 to December 2022. Patients received either SBRT + Sin + Bev (n = 31) or Sin + Bev alone (n = 38). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
resultsBaseline characteristics showed similar distributions between the two groups. SBRT + Sin + Bev group showed a significant increase in both median OS (18.9 vs 9.3 months, P < .001), median PFS (9.1 vs 4.7 months, P = .0015), and ORR (64.6% vs 26.3%, P = .031) compared to Sin + Bev group. TRAEs in SBRT + Sin + Bev group were mostly manageable and acceptable compared to Sin + Bev group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that SBRT + Sin + Bev was an independent prognostic factor for better OS (P < .001) and better PFS (P < .001).
conclusionSBRT combined with sintilimab plus bevacizumab appears to improve treatment efficacy and demonstrates a favorable safety and feasibility profile for HCC with PVTT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.