ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
"Bring your own" reusables to surgery: an environmental sustainability quality-improvement initiative.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOperating rooms (ORs) produce more than 30% of a hospital's total waste, with plastic accounting for 20% of that waste. Our project aimed to reduce OR plastic waste by encouraging patients at London Health Sciences Centre sites to bring reusable bags for their belongings and reusable water bottles.
methodsWe used the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality-improvement method, conducting 3 PDSA cycles, first at Nazem Kadri Surgical Centre, and then at Victoria Hospital and University Hospital. Educational interventions informed staff and encouraged patients to bring their own reusable items. Outcome measures included environmental carbon footprint savings, waste savings, and cost savings over a 1-year period. Process measures included the percentage of patients who brought their own reusable bags and water bottle, the percentage of plastic belongings bags purchased, and the percentage of patients informed to bring their own reusables. Balancing measures assessed patient satisfaction and administrative workflow changes.
resultsIn PDSA cycle 3 at University Hospital and Victoria Hospital, 60.0% and 78.0% of patients brought their own reusable bags for belongings, and 15.7% and 57.8% brought a reusable water bottle. There was a 45.7% reduction of plastic bags for patient belongings purchased annually, which equated to a reduction of 2141 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents, 10 393 km driven equivalent emissions, $1259.55 saved, and 252 kg of waste saved. Most patients and staff agreed that bringing reusable bags for surgery is easy.
conclusionThis quality-improvement initiative achieved high patient uptake of reusable items and resulted in substantial reductions in plastic use, waste, and associated carbon emissions. Transitioning to reusable bags for patient belongings and reusable water bottles is an environmentally friendly initiative to reduce the carbon footprint of an OR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.