ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2026
In utero exposure to medications and congenital eye anomalies.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to describe reports of congenital eye anomalies entered in the international pharmacovigilance database, with a particular focus on medications associated with this type of anomaly. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This descriptive, retrospective study selected reports using the adverse reaction term 'congenital eye disorders' and included only those instances where at least one medication was documented as being administered via the transplacental route. Statistical analyses were performed using R software.
resultsWe extracted 2923 reports of eye anomalies in children exposed to medications in utero and ultimately selected 676 of these. Congenital anomalies of the eyelids (17.3%), lacrimal apparatus (9.4%) and orbit (1.1%) were the most common. The suspect medications highlighted in this study include teratogenic agents known to pose a risk of triggering eye anomalies such as valproic acid and mycophenolic acid. The list also includes medications with little or no reference in the literature to potential eye anomalies following in utero exposure, such as hydroxychloroquine and ondansetron.
conclusionThis study provides new data on in utero exposure to medications and congenital eye anomalies that can be severely debilitating. This is a descriptive study, with all the inherent limitations of the pharmacovigilance databases which are used for signal detection. This descriptive study does not allow us to conclude that there is a causal link between exposure to a given medication during pregnancy and congenital eye anomalies and is a basis for future studies using different data sources and/or other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.