Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41494749›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2026

In utero exposure to medications and congenital eye anomalies.

Réjane Mairesse, Marianne Lepetit, Charlotte Dubucs, Erika-Alejandra Cifuentes, Christine Damase-Michel, Isabelle Lacroix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Réjane MairesseMedical and Clinical Pharmacology Department, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse University, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7509-1823
Marianne LepetitMedical and Clinical Pharmacology Department, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse University, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0265-3182
Charlotte DubucsService de Génétique médicale, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-4113
Erika-Alejandra CifuentesMedical and Clinical Pharmacology Department, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse University, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9978-3150
Christine Damase-MichelMedical and Clinical Pharmacology Department, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse University, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5018-0108
Isabelle LacroixMedical and Clinical Pharmacology Department, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse University, Toulouse, Occitanie, France isabelle.lacroix@univ-tlse3.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7344-7282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to describe reports of congenital eye anomalies entered in the international pharmacovigilance database, with a particular focus on medications associated with this type of anomaly. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This descriptive, retrospective study selected reports using the adverse reaction term 'congenital eye disorders' and included only those instances where at least one medication was documented as being administered via the transplacental route. Statistical analyses were performed using R software.

resultsWe extracted 2923 reports of eye anomalies in children exposed to medications in utero and ultimately selected 676 of these. Congenital anomalies of the eyelids (17.3%), lacrimal apparatus (9.4%) and orbit (1.1%) were the most common. The suspect medications highlighted in this study include teratogenic agents known to pose a risk of triggering eye anomalies such as valproic acid and mycophenolic acid. The list also includes medications with little or no reference in the literature to potential eye anomalies following in utero exposure, such as hydroxychloroquine and ondansetron.

conclusionThis study provides new data on in utero exposure to medications and congenital eye anomalies that can be severely debilitating. This is a descriptive study, with all the inherent limitations of the pharmacovigilance databases which are used for signal detection. This descriptive study does not allow us to conclude that there is a causal link between exposure to a given medication during pregnancy and congenital eye anomalies and is a basis for future studies using different data sources and/or other methods.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEye AbnormalitiesPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMalePharmacovigilancePregnancyRetrospective StudiesDrugsEmbryology and developmentVision

Identifiers

PMID41494749
PMCPMC12778234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.