ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Role of the general medical registrar in performing out-of-hours pleural procedures: a UK national survey of trainee and trainer perspectives.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Training in pleural interventions: not just a matter of 'rights'?BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUK General Internal Medicine (GIM) registrars are traditionally expected to be able to perform pleural procedures out-of-hours (OOH) if required. Pleural exposure for GIM registrars has declined, with procedures increasingly performed by specialists in-hours. Pleural procedures can cause significant harm. We explored the role of the GIM registrar in performing OOH pleural procedures, with particular focus on competence and confidence.
methodsAn anonymous survey was distributed to GIM registrars and respiratory consultants across the UK.
resultsResponses were received from 391 non-respiratory GIM registrars and 93 respiratory consultants. 37% of registrars reported being 'signed-off' as independent in chest drain insertion for pneumothorax. 69% had not done a pleural procedure for at least a year. Regarding perceived confidence for OOH chest drain insertion for pneumothorax, 42% reported no confidence to perform the procedure even if directly supervised, with only 11% feeling confident to proceed unsupervised. Consultants rated the pleural competence of an average non-respiratory GIM registrar; only 4% felt they could perform the procedure unsupervised. Common themes in the free text included anxiety surrounding pleural procedures, patient safety concerns, insufficient available training opportunities to maintain competency and differing opinions on the evolving role of the medical registrar and who should be expected to perform OOH pleural procedures.
conclusionsThe majority of UK GIM registrars are neither confident nor perceived by trainers as competent to independently perform OOH chest drain insertion. This has implications for patient safety and service delivery, informing broader discussions regarding GIM training, curriculum and the need to establish local OOH pleural pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.