ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Association between metabolic score for visceral fat and adverse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the Joint Impact of METS-VF and Functional Limitation on Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity Risk.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe metabolic score of visceral fat (METS-VF) is linked to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) incidence, while its association with mortality and adverse outcomes in patients with COPD remains unclear. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analysed 7246 participants with COPD from the UK Biobank and 869 from US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (US NHANES) (1999-2018). METS-VF was categorised into quartiles. In UK Biobank, outcomes included all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), COPD-specific mortality, pulmonary heart disease (PHD), pulmonary embolism (PE) and heart failure (HF); in NHANES, only all-cause and CVD mortality were evaluated. UK Biobank analyses used Cox models, restricted cubic splines, Kaplan-Meier curves, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and mediation analysis (C reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT)). NHANES served as an external validation cohort using survey-weighted Cox models, subgroup and sensitivity analyses and time-dependent ROC for the two mortality outcomes.
resultsIn UK Biobank, restricted cubic splines identified non-linear associations of METS-VF with all-cause and CVD mortality, with a common inflection point at 7.03, and linear associations with secondary outcomes. Compared with the lowest quartile, the highest METS-VF quartile showed significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.467), CVD mortality (HR 3.000), COPD-specific mortality (HR 1.952), PHD (HR 3.505), PE (HR 2.301) and HF (HR 2.567). Similar positive associations were observed in NHANES, where the highest METS-VF quartile remained significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 3.337) and CVD mortality (HR 3.011). Time-dependent ROC analyses demonstrated modest but stable discrimination across follow-up in both cohorts. Mediation analyses showed that CRP and WBC partially mediated the associations of METS-VF with mortality and cardiopulmonary outcomes, whereas PLT did not exhibit significant mediation effects.
conclusionsElevated METS-VF is consistently associated with increased long-term risks of mortality and cardiopulmonary complications in COPD across independent discovery and validation cohorts. METS-VF may serve as a practical prognostic biomarker for risk stratification in the clinical management of COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.