ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Cognitive sequala of loneliness in long COVID: Differential associations by loneliness subtypes.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveLoneliness is a risk factor for cognitive decline in aging and other clinical populations, but its role in long COVID (LC) remains poorly understood. Individuals with LC may be particularly vulnerable to loneliness due to debilitating, persistent symptoms and reduced functioning. We examined associations between overall loneliness and cognition in LC versus recovered controls, and whether loneliness subtypes (social, emotional) differentially relate to cognitive function.
methodsIndividuals meeting 2024 National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine criteria (NASEM) for LC and reporting at least one neuropsychiatric symptom (n = 120), along with recovered controls (n = 51), completed the 6-item De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale and a cognitive test battery. Correlation analyses, corrected for false discovery rate, identified bivariate loneliness-cognition associations. Significant correlations were followed by age-adjusted regressions using residualized loneliness scores, which excluded variance shared with depression and social isolation.
resultsLC participants reported higher overall, emotional, and social loneliness than controls. In bivariate analyses, greater overall and emotional loneliness were associated with more subjective cognitive complaints and poorer verbal fluency in the full sample and LC group, and with cognitive complaints and poorer verbal memory in controls. In adjusted models, residual overall and emotional loneliness remained significantly associated with fluency in LC and the full sample, and with memory in controls. Associations with cognitive complaints did not persist. Social loneliness showed weaker and inconsistent associations.
conclusionOverall and emotional loneliness are independently linked to objective cognitive difficulties. Findings highlight emotional loneliness as a potential target for cognitive intervention in LC and recovered individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.