Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41494008›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The association between rural/urban residence status and patient-reported outcomes in individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

McKenzie Granata Green, Laurie L Meschke, Thankam Sunil, Javiette Samuel, Kristina W Kintziger, Phoebe M Tran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

McKenzie Granata GreenDepartment of Public Health, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3821-8282
Laurie L MeschkeDepartment of Public Health, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Thankam SunilDepartment of Public Health, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Javiette SamuelOffice of Community Engagement and Outreach, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Kristina W KintzigerCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha Nebraska, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3555-7805
Phoebe M TranDepartment of Public Health, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRural residency is associated with a disproportionate burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and poorer COPD health outcomes. While increasing focus has been placed on the influence of rural/urban residence on clinical outcomes, little is known about the impact of rural versus urban residency status on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in individuals with COPD, despite the use of PROMs to tailor interventions and treatments to individual patient needs.

objectiveThe objective of this review is to synthesize evidence of a relation between rural/urban residency status and PROMs in individuals with COPD.

methodsBeginning May 2025, we will search EBSCO, Elsevier, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and relevant websites to identify research published between January 1, 2012, and November 1, 2024. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full texts, with a third reviewer to resolve any discrepancies. All data sources and selection management will be fulfilled and housed in the Covidence systematic review software. The primary outcome of this review is the association between rural/urban residency and PROMs in individuals with COPD. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Sub-group analysis will be performed by sex. Sensitivity analysis will be performed by excluding studies with "low quality" based on risk of bias assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is exempt from institutional review as it will be a secondary analysis of published data. Results of this study are expected by September 2025 and will be disseminated in a relevant peer-reviewed journal.

trial registrationProspero registration number: CRD42024627343.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRural PopulationUrban PopulationHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41494008
PMCPMC12774352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.