Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493995›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

"Grandmothers as gatekeepers": The role of older women in addressing vaccine hesitancy in urban slum communities in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Folusho Mubowale Balogun, Olubukola Christianah Omobowale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Folusho Mubowale BalogunInstitute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-9106
Olubukola Christianah OmobowaleUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is responsible for the resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases in Nigeria due to suboptimal immunization as seen in urban slums. Older women are traditionally influential in infant health decision-making in African communities; however, their roles in addressing vaccine hesitancy remain underexplored. This study explored the perceived reasons for vaccine hesitancy and methods employed by older women to address vaccine hesitancy in selected urban slum communities in Ibadan, Nigeria. Narrative study design was adopted, and 22 focus group discussions were conducted with 175 older women from seven urban slum communities. Content analysis was used to analyze the data using the World Health Organization Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) '3 Cs' model of vaccine hesitancy (complacency, convenience, confidence) and vaccine hesitancy determinant matrix. Perceived causes of vaccine hesitancy included poor knowledge about the importance of vaccines, parental nonchalance, low vaccination priority (Complacency), long clinic waiting times and vaccine stockouts (Convenience), mistrust of volunteers, poor healthcare workers' attitude, immunization misconceptions, and previous negative experiences (Confidence). Older women addressed vaccine hesitancy through community mobilization, engagement with religious leaders, advocacy at the individual level, and by supporting trust in qualified health personnel. The older women demonstrated significant potential as key resources for addressing vaccine hesitancy. Leveraging their roles by formalizing their involvement in immunization programs could enhance the vaccination uptake in urban slum communities. Also, the existing approaches for handling vaccine hesitancy can be standardized to improve vaccination uptake.

Identifiers

PMID41493995
PMCPMC12774366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.