Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493985›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

An integrated multi-criteria decision-making model for long-term planning of UAVs in disaster management.

Mustafa Erdem Bakir, Fatih Kasimoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mustafa Erdem BakirDepartment of Unmanned and Autonomous System Engineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Turkish Aeronautical Association, Ankara, Turkey.
Fatih KasimogluDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Turkish Aeronautical Association, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5818-9342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With their superior capabilities, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) play a crucial role in search, rescue, and surveillance operations in disaster management. It is of great importance in the long run to optimally designate the base locations and deployment plans of the UAVs needing a base for their operations. In this study, we develop an integrated multi-criteria decision-making model to select bases and plan missions of UAVs using a combination of multi-attribute and multi-objective optimization techniques, with the decision maker having an interactive role. We formulate a goal programming model in which the number of bases, flight distance, unairworthy days, and cost are jointly minimized. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to designate the associated goal weights. We develop Algorithm 1 to identify the target level for each goal and Algorithm 2 to refine the model for better solutions. We apply the process in a problem setting where designated disaster activity zones (DAZs) need to be covered by some candidate bases, among which an optimal selection is made. The model's validation and refinement were evaluated across multiple scenarios. The illustrative example yields improvements of 8.57% in cost in the first scenario and 7.54% in distance in the second. The third scenario achieves 7.66% and 6.58% improvements in distance and cost, respectively. A real-world earthquake scenario from Türkiye further demonstrates the model's practical applicability, with 5% improvement in distance and 14.8% in cost. The results of the proposed decision-making process guarantee satisfactory solutions for long-term base and operational planning of UAVs.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDisaster PlanningModels, TheoreticalUnmanned Aerial DevicesAlgorithmsDecision Support TechniquesHumans

Identifiers

PMID41493985
PMCPMC12774348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.