Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493980›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The Patriarchy Index for Asia: A new tool for subnational analysis of gender inequalities.

Mikołaj Szołtysek, Bartosz Ogórek, Mateusz Grzyb, Siegfried Gruber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mikołaj SzołtysekInstitute of Sociological Sciences, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, The Cardinal Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4814-5586
Bartosz OgórekInstitute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-7936
Mateusz GrzybInstitute of Sociological Sciences, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, The Cardinal Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Siegfried GruberSoutheast European History and Anthropology, Institute of History, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-4020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender inequality remains a persistent barrier to development in many parts of Asia, yet the domestic foundations of this inequality-particularly within family systems-are often neglected in global measurement tools. This study introduces the Patriarchy Index (PI), a new metric constructed from census microdata to capture gendered power hierarchies in families across 22 Asian (including Egypt, treated here as part of the classical Asian patriarchal belt) countries and 652 subnational administrative units. Of particular interest to development practitioners and scholars, the PI offers a scalable, low-cost tool for subnational diagnostics, especially where standard measures of gender equality are missing or fail to reflect private-sphere constraints on women's autonomy. Our study addresses whether domestic arrangements-such as patterns of co-residence, marriage timing, and age-based authority-can reliably capture institutionalized patriarchy, and what regional variation these patterns reveal. Using harmonized IPUMS-International census microdata and eleven theoretically grounded indicators, we construct a multidimensional composite index empirically validated through convergence with existing gender measures, divergence from unrelated metrics, and correlation with gendered development outcomes. Our study finds that family-based patriarchy is spatially clustered and highly variable at the subnational level. It further shows that higher PI values are significantly associated with reduced relative female labor force participation, even after controlling for structural variables such as gross national income and urbanization. These results underscore the PI's value as a complementary measure: it captures dimensions of gender inequality that remain invisible to public-facing or outcome-based indicators and helps bridge the gap between domestic constraints and broader patterns of disenfranchisement. In contexts where legal reform and female empowerment are pursued without addressing household-level structures, the PI offers a diagnostic that speaks directly to the architecture of family systems-illuminating where and how deeper constraints on gender equality endure.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsGender EquityAsiaFamily StructureFemaleHumansMaleSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID41493980
PMCPMC12774345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.