ArticleJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
Implementation of Daily Oral PrEP at HIV/AIDS Service Organizations in Lima, Peru: Early Findings From the PrEP PERU Demonstration Study.
Article in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying Implementation Gaps in the HIV Prevention Cascade among Peruvian Men Who Have Sex with Men.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundDespite global declines in HIV incidence, new infections continue to rise in Latin America. Oral tenofovir-based HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective and can reduce incidence where implemented. PrEP PERU is a prospective cohort study evaluating daily oral PrEP delivery at HIV/AIDS service organizations (ASOs) in Peru.MethodsWe assessed 12-month PrEP retention and adherence among men who have sex with men (MSM) enrolled at 4 ASOs in Lima before the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis included participants with ≥12 months of follow-up before the March 2020 lockdown. Follow-up visits occurred at weeks 4, 12, and quarterly thereafter. We used robust Poisson regression to evaluate associations between baseline characteristics and 2 outcomes: retention (attending ≥3 follow-up visits within 12 months) and optimal adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%).ResultsAmong 264 MSM who initiated PrEP, median age was 31 years (IQR: 27-37). Retention at 12 months was 71%, and 55% achieved optimal adherence. Retention was associated with age ≥30 and bisexual identity in adjusted models. Optimal adherence was associated with being employed at baseline.ConclusionsPrEP delivery through ASOs in Lima is feasible and supports sustained engagement among MSM. Targeted strategies are needed to improve outcomes among younger individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.