Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493833›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2026

Developmental Sentence Scoring for Preschool Language Sample Analysis: A Psychometric Update.

Nan Bernstein Ratner, Brian MacWhinney, Youmin Hong, Ji Seung Yang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nan Bernstein RatnerUniversity of Maryland, College Park.ORCID 0000-0002-9947-0656
Brian MacWhinneyCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-4988-1342
Youmin HongUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Ji Seung YangUniversity of Maryland, College Park.ORCID 0000-0001-6621-9548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to validate the ability of Developmental Sentence Scoring (DSS) to distinguish age and diagnostic category in a large, open-access corpus of American English-speaking adult-child language interactions at TalkBank.org. We additionally sought to identify whether subscales differed by age and diagnostic category, to explore the potential for adapting DSS to shorter language samples.

methodWe utilized data from 501 children (ages 2-6 years; 50-utterance sample criterion) and 842 children (25-utterance sample criterion) as well as the open-access DSS utility in Computerized Language Analysis to analyze growth in DSS total and subscale scores and distinguish typical- and late-talker grammatical profiles.

resultsDSS total scores were most informative at younger ages; scores of typically developing (TD) children and children with a history of late talking converged over time. The most sensitive subscale was Main Verbs (MV). Shorter samples (25 utterances) were generally as informative as longer ones. Scores derived from our analyses were generally much higher than those reported by Lee (1974). DISCUSSION: Shorter samples (25 utterances) are as informative as longer ones for both diagnostic and therapy planning purposes. Beyond the MV subscale, DSS may have greater utility in identifying therapy intervention targets than in diagnosing language delay. Finally, use of the original percentile scores for the DSS reported by Lee (1974) may underidentify children whose language lags significantly behind that of TD peers. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30907109.

Indexed as

Child LanguageLanguage DevelopmentLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TestsPsychometricsAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID41493833
PMCPMC12805810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.