Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493759›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2026

Associations Between COVID-19 Business and Social Gathering Restrictions and Deaths by Suicide in the United States: A Cross-Sectional County-Level Analysis.

Matthew Spiegel, Robert H Pietrzak, Peter J Na

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew SpiegelSchool of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Robert H PietrzakNational Center for PTSD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Peter J NaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. peter.na@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3895-7417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between COVID-19 restrictions and suicide rates, particularly concerning business and social restriction policies. This study aimed to address this gap by analyzing detailed US county-level restriction and suicide death data. Study Design Data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were obtained for county-level suicide rates by race, sex, and age from 2016 to 2023. Yale School of Management-Tobin Center State and Local COVID Restriction Database provided data on COVID-19 social and business restrictions. These datasets were combined with other relevant data on county-level demographics, gross domestic product (GDP), unemployment, and population density. Methods Poisson interrupted time-series regression was employed to assess whether these restrictions were associated with changes in suicide rates during pandemic (2020 and 2021) and post-pandemic (2022 and 2023) periods. Results During the pandemic restriction era of 2020–2021, stricter business capacity limits were linked to lower suicide rates overall (Poisson coefficient: -0.90 [95% CI -1.54, -0.25, p = 0.006]), and in particular among males (Poisson coefficient: -1.13 [-1.94, -0.32, p = 0.006]). The estimated coefficient was not statistically significant for females. Among age groups, individuals aged 25–34 and 35–44 experienced lower suicide rates in counties with tighter restrictions, while other age and sex groups did not show similar trends. Additionally, no statistically significant correlations were found across racial groups. In contrast, social gathering restrictions had a less consistent relationship with suicide rates; while those aged 15–24 experienced an increase in rates under tighter restrictions, those aged 25–34 had a decrease. No other demographic groups yielded statistically significant coefficient estimates. Conclusions Results underscore the importance of considering differential effects of business and social restrictions on suicide rates, and to tailor interventions to address the unique needs of specific populations during public health crises.

Indexed as

Business capacity limitsCOVID-19Social gathering restrictionsSuicide

Identifiers

PMID41493759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.