Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493727›Full record

Trial reportOdontology2026

Effectiveness of osseodensification in enhancing implant stability and ridge expansion in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Mohamed Ahmed Hammouda, Mona Elsayed Lotfy, Souzy Kamal Anwar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06667778 (Effectiveness of Osseodensification in Enhancing Implant Stability and Ridge Expansion in Esthetic Region), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06667778 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Osseodensification in Enhancing Implant Stability and Ridge Expansion in Esthetic Region (a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHams Hamed AbdelrahmanRan2021 to 2021Enrolled18ConditionsDental Implant, Bone ExpantionArmsOsseodesification densah burs, Microdent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed Ahmed HammoudaOral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis, and Oral Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion St., Azarita, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt.
Mona Elsayed LotfyOral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis, and Oral Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion St., Azarita, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt.
Souzy Kamal AnwarOral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis, and Oral Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion St., Azarita, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt. souzy.kamal@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-6243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anterior or esthetic region frequently exhibits compromised bone volume and quality, posing challenges for implant placement. Attaining optimal implant stability while preserving or augmenting ridge dimensions is essential for both functional success and long-term esthetic outcomes. Osseodensification, a biomechanical site preparation technique, compacts rather than removes bone, potentially enhancing stability and facilitating ridge expansion. Our research aimed to compare osseodensification with conventional manual bone expanders in enhancing implant stability and ridge expansion in the esthetic zone. A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on eighteen patients missing a maxillary anterior tooth with moderate horizontal ridge deficiency (3-4 mm width, ≥ 10 mm height). Participants were equally allocated into two groups: Group I (osseodensification), where sites were prepared using Densah burs in densifying mode, and Group II (manual expanders), prepared with Microdent expanders. Implants were assessed for primary stability at placement and secondary stability at 16 weeks using resonance frequency analysis. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed at baseline and 16 weeks to evaluate ridge expansion, bone density, and marginal bone loss. Both groups demonstrated significant intra-group increases in ridge width and bone density. No significant differences were noted between groups in ridge expansion or marginal bone loss. However, osseodensification yielded significantly higher secondary stability values compared with expanders. Within the study's limitations, osseodensification enabled safe ridge expansion and simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic zone, providing superior stability without observed complications. It represents a predictable, minimally invasive technique that supports successful and esthetically favorable implant outcomes.Trial registration NCT06667778 retrospectively on 31/10/2024, Clinicaltrial.gov.

Indexed as

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsEsthetics, DentalAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeDental ImplantsBone expandersDensah bursDental implantOsseodensificationOsstell

Identifiers

PMID41493727
PMCPMC13630983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.