Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493696›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2026

Dendritic interaction of timescales in afterdepolarization potentials and nonmonotonic spike-adding.

Nils A Koch, Yifan Zhao, Anmar Khadra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nils A KochIntegrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Yifan ZhaoDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anmar KhadraIntegrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. anmar.khadra@mcgill.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-04520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depolarizations that occur after action potentials, known as afterdepolarization potentials or ADPs, are important for neuronal excitability and stimulus evoked transient bursting. Slow inward and fast outward currents underlie the generation of such ADPs with modulation of ADP amplitudes occurring as a result of neuronal morphology. However, the relative contribution and role of these slow inward and fast outward currents in ADP generation is poorly understood in the context of somatic and dendritic localization as well as with varied dendritic properties. Using a two-compartment Hodgkin-Huxley type model of cerebellar stellate cells, the role of somatic and dendritic compartmentalization of ADP associated currents is investigated, revealing that dendritic (rather than somatic) slow inward and fast outward currents are the main contributors to ADP and spike-adding during both brief step current and AMPA current input. Additionally, dendritic size and passive properties of the dendrites were found to be key modulators of ADP amplitude. However, increasing magnitudes of NMDA current input resulted in nonmonotonic spike-adding in a manner dependent on dendritic Ca

Indexed as

Action PotentialsDendritesModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimalsCalciumCerebellumComputer SimulationHumansCalciumAfterdepolarization potentialsCerebellar stellate cellsDendritic computationNeuronal excitabilitySpike addingTransient bursting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.