ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Prognosis and endocrine therapy efficacy in early breast cancer with estrogen receptor low expression.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the prognosis and endocrine therapy (ET) efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-low breast cancer.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer at a single institution in China from January 2010 to December 2020. Clinicopathological features, survival outcomes, and the effect of ET were compared among patients with ER-low, ER-high, and ER-negative breast cancer. Analyses were stratified by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status (positive or negative).
resultsA total of 2951 patients were included, consisting of 131 (4.4%) ER-low, 2040 (69.1%) ER-high, and 780 (26.4%) ER-negative patients. In the HER2-negative subgroup, ER-low patients had significantly worse breast cancer-free survival (BCFS) (P = 0.016) and a higher risk of locoregional recurrence (P < 0.001) compared to ER-high patients, while no significant differences were observed in prognosis between ER-low and ER-negative patients. In the HER2-positive subgroup, there were no significant differences in prognosis among patients with different ER expression levels. ET could significantly reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis and significantly improve BCFS for ER-low patients, especially in the HER2-negative subgroup. However, in the HER2-positive subgroup, ET did not improve BCFS or overall survival for ER-low patients.
conclusionHER2-negative/ER-low breast cancer has a similar clinical behavior to triple-negative breast cancer, and ET could significantly reduce the risk of recurrence and metastasis for this subgroup. However, in HER2-positive patients, ER-low breast cancer lacks a predictive role in prognosis and derives no clear benefit from ET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41493657What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.