ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Efficacy and safety of single-trajectory posterior subthalamic area and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for dystonic tremor: a retrospective pilot study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a novel single-lead, dual-target deep brain stimulation (DBS) approach targeting the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) for dystonic tremor.
methodsThis retrospective pilot study reviewed outcomes of six consecutive patients with medically refractory dystonic tremor who underwent single-lead PSA-STN DBS at our center (June-December 2024). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the BFMDRS and FTMTRS scales. A formal blinded crossover assessment was performed in three patients to compare PSA-only, STN-only, and combined stimulation. Chronic settings were selected via patient-directed optimization.
resultsAll six patients completed follow-up (100% retention) and achieved stable chronic stimulation programs. Five patients (83.3%) independently selected combined PSA + STN stimulation; one preferred STN-only. At LFU (6-12 months postoperatively), the mean BFMDRS-Motor score decreased by 78.1% and FTMTRS by 87.1%. The crossover assessment (n = 3) showed that combined stimulation outperformed single-target stimulation. No serious adverse events occurred. All efficacy analyses are exploratory.
conclusionThis single-lead, dual-target PSA-STN DBS approach demonstrates feasibility and preliminary efficacy for dystonic tremor. Prospective controlled trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.