SynthesisEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Assessment of golf-specific skill performance: a systematic review, 3D visualization, and standardized testing framework.
Synthesis in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSkill testing is a key component of sports science, yet research on golf performance assessment remains limited. This study aims to systematically review existing methods for evaluating golf performance and to visually present their design principles and indicator systems using a 3D bubble chart, ultimately proposing an optimized and standardized testing framework for golf skills.
methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, this study conducted a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and Google Scholar, ultimately including 13 studies for analysis.
resultsCombined with 3D visualization indicate that existing research is overly concentrated on driving and putting, while iron and chipping tests are markedly underrepresented, limiting the comprehensive understanding of the four core golf skills. The number of shots and selection of measurement variables lack standardization. Although complex biomechanical and club-ball dynamics indicators can help explain performance mechanisms, overemphasis on these measures often overlooks the core objective of golf-getting the ball into the hole.
conclusionThis study proposes a standardized modular testing framework centered on "target-hitting." Consists of four modules: ball-striking zone (e.g., grass, bunkers, slopes), target zone (e.g., fairway, green, and varying sizes), shot distance, and club selection. By adjusting the combination of modules, it can simulate complex scenarios and accommodate athletes of different skill levels, providing a scientific reference for research, training, and performance evaluation. This study also provides guidance on the test modules and test site setup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41493587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.