ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Robotics in knee arthroplasty : Current status and developments].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) represents a technological advancement aiming to improve implant alignment and soft tissue balancing. Current evidence confirms increased precision and reproducibility; however, no significant benefits have been shown compared to manual TKA (mTKA) regarding functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, or implant longevity. Challenges such as longer operative time and workflow complexity can be mitigated with structured training and process optimization. Registry data and clinical studies so far do not indicate a survival benefit. Nevertheless, robotic systems offer promising advantages in complex anatomies, and individualized alignment strategies. High-quality long-term studies are needed to definitively assess the clinical value of rTKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41493553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.