ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Are we ready for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) monitoring? A European survey among neuroradiologists and neurologists by the ESNR/EAN Working Group.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies in early Alzheimer's disease: a cochrane review summary and appraisal for the neurological community.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAmyloid-lowering immunotherapies can cause amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), requiring brain MRI for detection and monitoring. The European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR)/European Academy of Neurology (EAN) ARIA Working Group conducted a survey to assess European clinicians' readiness for this logistical challenge and need for further education on ARIA. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn online questionnaire with 32 items (multiple choice, single best choice, and free text) was distributed to ESNR and EAN members. Between June and July 2024, we collected 422 responses from 41 European countries, including 47% neurologists and 51% (neuro)radiologists; 15% were residents, and 58% worked in academic hospitals.
resultsOf respondents, 69% were familiar with the concept of ARIA, and 60% reportedly understood its risk factors. Confidence in evaluating ARIA-E (edema/effusion) and ARIA-H (hemorrhage) subtypes was reported by 60% and 69%, respectively, with (neuro)radiologists more confident than neurologists. However, 34% of respondents felt poorly equipped to meet logistical demands, and 82% lacked a dedicated ARIA imaging protocol. Key barriers included limited organizational adaptability and radiology expertise. Notably, 72% saw potential in having support by artificial intelligence approaches, and 93% expressed the wish for further training on how to monitor ARIA.
conclusionsDespite the current unavailability of amyloid-lowering therapies, European neurologists and (neuro)radiologists report reasonable ARIA awareness. There is a clear need for additional practical preparation and training in ARIA assessment, which can inform future ESNR/EAN educational initiatives. KEY POINTS: Question Are neurologists and neuroradiologists ready for ARIA monitoring? Findings Neurologists and neuroradiologists were moderately familiar with the concept of ARIA, its risk factors, and its identification on MRI, but felt poorly equipped to meet the logistical demands. Clinical relevance With the potential introduction of amyloid-lowering therapies in European countries, identifying key barriers, such as limited organizational adaptability and radiology expertise, highlights the need for further practical preparation by clinical departments and additional training in ARIA assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41493545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.