ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
PVADet: fast patient-ventilator asynchrony detection on waveforms.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in mechanical ventilation: a narrative review of clinical applications and research gaps.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a common and critically import clinical problem in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. However, PVAs are often underrecognized, underestimated and delayed, and there has been minimal success in automating their detection. In this study, we develop an efficient and fast end-to-end model to recognize PVAs on ventilator waveforms: running the model costs 106.5ms on CPUs and 7.8ms on GPUs. We propose label striping and stripe-mask encoding for efficient multi-class multi-target detecting. The model innovatively integrates causal convolutional, depth-wise separable convolutional, and recurrent neural networks to memorize long short-term causal features. With 60s waveform segments, our model performs a cross-validation mean average precision (mAP) of 88.1% and a testing mAP of 65.7% for comprehensive PVA detection. Our approach might be implemented as a monitoring tool to automatically identify PVAs for improving bedside and remote care and prioritizing patient comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41493521What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.