ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Cognitive function in patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Demyelinating disorders in women: epidemiology, immunology, and clinical implications across MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on cognition in adult patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (pwMOGAD) are scarce.
objectiveTo examine cognitive function in pwMOGAD and assess relative risks (RR) for cognitive impairment (CImp) in pwMOGAD relative to healthy controls (HC), aquaporin 4-immunoglobulin G positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (pwAQP4+NMOSD), and double-seronegative NMOSD (pwdsNMOSD) compared to HC.
methodsData derived from a cohort with neuroimmunological disorders. Cognitive performance was assessed using Rao's brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests, compared to HC using confounder-adjusted linear regressions. CImp was defined as performing two standard deviations below the HC mean in any subtest. RR for CImp was calculated using generalized linear models.
resultsWe evaluated cognitive performance of 21 pwMOGAD and 25 HC. CImp was additionally determined in 43 pwAQP4+NMOSD and 15 pwdsNMOSD. PwMOGAD performed worse on Selective Reminding Test, and the symbol digit modalities test compared to HC. Adjusted RR for CImp were 1.9 (95% CI 0.9-4.1) in pwMOGAD, 1.9 (95% CI 1.0-3.9) in pwAQP4+NMOSD and 2.1 (95% CI 0.9-4.6) in pwdsNMOSD.
conclusionpwMOGAD performed worse in information processing speed, verbal learning, storage and retrieval compared to HC. RR for CImp in pwMOGAD compared to HC was similar to that estimated for pwAQP4+NMOSD and pwdsNMOSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.