ArticleParasitology research2026
A framework for optimising arthropod DNA quality and quantity for modern sequencing tools using hard ticks (Ixodidae).
Article in Parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced sequencing technologies require strict standards for DNA input and integrity. This study addresses the challenge of extracting high-quality, endogenous DNA from smaller arthropods with mixed DNA sources (arthropod, host, and microbiome), using Amblyomma triguttatum as a model organism. We evaluated three tissue types (Whole, Bisected, and Legs), three disruption methods (Undisrupted, Sliced, and liquid nitrogen bead Homogenisation), and two extraction kits (Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue and MagAttract HMW) to optimise DNA yield, quality, and composition. The Qiagen MagAttract High Molecular Weight Kit significantly increased the proportion of large DNA fragments (20-48.5 kbp) by 11-fold compared to the Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit. Aggressive homogenisation methods produced the highest proportion of short fragments (97%, 1-10 kbp). Whole-Homogenised specimens yielded the highest DNA concentration (198 ng µL⁻¹), whereas Bisected-Undisrupted specimens achieved 146 ng µL⁻¹ with a greater proportion of large fragments (3.15%). Bacterial DNA content remained consistent across treatments. Our findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate extraction methods to ensure optimal DNA quality for advanced sequencing applications. These results provide useful guidelines for optimising DNA extractions from smaller-bodied arthropods (~ 10-20 mg) and establish a framework for future studies to consider DNA quantity, quality, and composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.