Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493496›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2026

A framework for optimising arthropod DNA quality and quantity for modern sequencing tools using hard ticks (Ixodidae).

X W Barton, S S Tobe, J B Fontaine, C L Oskam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

X W BartonSchool of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, 6150, Australia. x.barton@murdoch.edu.au.
S S TobeSchool of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, 6150, Australia.
J B FontaineSchool of Environmental and Conservation Sciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch University, Perth, 6150, Australia.
C L OskamSchool of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, 6150, Australia. c.oskam@murdoch.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced sequencing technologies require strict standards for DNA input and integrity. This study addresses the challenge of extracting high-quality, endogenous DNA from smaller arthropods with mixed DNA sources (arthropod, host, and microbiome), using Amblyomma triguttatum as a model organism. We evaluated three tissue types (Whole, Bisected, and Legs), three disruption methods (Undisrupted, Sliced, and liquid nitrogen bead Homogenisation), and two extraction kits (Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue and MagAttract HMW) to optimise DNA yield, quality, and composition. The Qiagen MagAttract High Molecular Weight Kit significantly increased the proportion of large DNA fragments (20-48.5 kbp) by 11-fold compared to the Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit. Aggressive homogenisation methods produced the highest proportion of short fragments (97%, 1-10 kbp). Whole-Homogenised specimens yielded the highest DNA concentration (198 ng µL⁻¹), whereas Bisected-Undisrupted specimens achieved 146 ng µL⁻¹ with a greater proportion of large fragments (3.15%). Bacterial DNA content remained consistent across treatments. Our findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate extraction methods to ensure optimal DNA quality for advanced sequencing applications. These results provide useful guidelines for optimising DNA extractions from smaller-bodied arthropods (~ 10-20 mg) and establish a framework for future studies to consider DNA quantity, quality, and composition.

Indexed as

AmblyommaDNAIxodidaeSequence Analysis, DNASpecimen HandlingAnimalsDNADNA fragmentationDNA yieldHard ticks (Ixodidae)High molecular weight DNATissue disruption

Identifiers

PMID41493496
PMCPMC12774991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.