ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Cumulative Summation Test for Learning Curve in Vaginal Tightening.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to evaluate the learning curve of vaginoplasty procedures performed by two trainees with different levels of experience using the Learning Curve Cumulative Summation (LC-CUSUM) method.
methodsThis prospective study included 80 consecutive vaginoplasty cases performed by two trainees after structured theoretical and hands-on training. Trainee 1 was a senior resident in the third year of the Obstetrics and Gynecology specialty training program, with no prior experience in urogynecological surgery, whereas Trainee 2 was a certified specialist with a relevant surgical background. Both trainees were evaluated using LC-CUSUM parameters based on predefined acceptable (10%) and unacceptable (17.5%) failure rates. The number of procedures required to reach competency was recorded.
resultsTrainee 1 reached the predefined performance level after 27 procedures, whereas Trainee 2 achieved it after 14. No major complications occurred. The LC-CUSUM curves confirmed gradual and safe skill acquisition in both cases. Patient satisfaction scores were high in both groups, with no statistically significant differences in complication rates.
conclusionThe LC-CUSUM method provides an objective and individualized tool to assess surgical competence in vaginoplasty. It enables dynamic monitoring of learning curves and may contribute to safer surgical training, especially in procedures where experience heavily influences outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41493467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.