Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41493368›Full record

SynthesisAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2026

Effectiveness and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Shahd Mohammad, Yamama Al Namer, Wafaa Rahimeh, Mosab Albalas, Thamer A Almangour

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shahd MohammadClinical Pharmacy Department, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0009-0004-1483-2550
Yamama Al NamerPharmacy Department, Sheikh Tahnoon Bin Mohammad Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-0828-0265
Wafaa RahimehClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0009-0005-1953-5157
Mosab AlbalasClinical Pharmacy Department, Sheikh Tahnoon Bin Mohammad Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Thamer A AlmangourClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1508-8693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance driven by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens poses a major global threat, contributing to substantial morbidity and mortality. Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, particularly meropenem-vaborbactam (M/V) and ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A), have expanded therapeutic options; however, their comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This meta-analysis compared M/V and C/A in adult patients with MDR Gram-negative infections. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched for studies evaluating M/V versus C/A in hospitalized adults. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, clinical cure, and microbiological recurrence; safety was assessed qualitatively. Data were synthesized using Review Manager, with trial sequential analysis (TSA) applied to minimize random error. Five retrospective cohort studies (three full articles and two conference abstracts) comprising 3,280 patients were included, of whom 577 received M/V and 2,703 received C/A. Populations predominantly consisted of older adults aged 57-70 years, with respiratory tract infections being most common. Pooled analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences between M/V compared to C/A in all-cause mortality (Odds ratio [OR] 0.87; 95% CI 0.69-1.11;

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsBoron CompoundsBoronic AcidsCeftazidimeGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsMeropenemDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsBoron CompoundsBoronic AcidsCeftazidimeDrug CombinationsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingMeropenemmeropenem and vaborbactamvaborbactamcarbapenem-resistant enterobacteralesceftazidime–avibactammeropenem–vaborbactammeta-analysisβ-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41493368
PMCPMC12888891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.