ArticleImmunology and cell biology2026
Humoral epitope dominance and immune imprinting by SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Article in Immunology and cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-lasting protective immunity against sarbecoviruses is hampered by the dominance of elicited antibodies to variable parts of the Spike protein, allowing ongoing viral escape and evolution. We investigated Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine candidates expressing the SARS-CoV-1 or SARS-CoV-2 Spike for their ability to induce antibodies targeting different epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), including those with wide variant conservation. We also explored the capacity of these different Spike proteins to induce broad cross-reactive or cross-neutralizing B cells against multiple variants. This revealed that the SARS-CoV-1 Spike induced distinct patterns of epitope dominance compared to the traditional SARS-CoV-2 Spike antigens. Following immune imprinting by previous exposure to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Spike, the epitope dominance patterns induced by SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines still differed, with most of the germinal center response consisting of de novo recruited B cells. In addition to the de novo response, B cells with germline cross-reactivity to both antigens further increased their binding toward the most recently immunized antigen. Interestingly, we found that, while SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated animals were extremely capable of mounting an antigen-specific germinal center and plasmablast response to a booster immunization with SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2 boosters were less capable of inducing SARS-CoV-2 specific B cells following prior SARS-CoV-1 vaccination. These findings have broad implications for the implementation of vaccine strategies against emerging coronavirus variants and potential future coronavirus spillover events. The implications stemming from a fundamental directionality of immune imprinting and epitope dominance may have wider implications for noncoronavirus antigens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.