SynthesisEnvironmental toxicology2026
Coupled Bibliometric and Systematic Review on the Molecular Effects of Estrogenic Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Microplastics in Mollusks.
Synthesis in Environmental toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estrogenic endocrine disrupting chemicals (EEDCs) and microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous pollutants in aquatic systems. This study performed a bibliometric analysis, coupled with a systematic review, of 72 articles that used omics approaches to evaluate the molecular effects of these pollutants on mollusks. Cluster and co-occurrence analyses mapped research themes, and relative frequency and temporal analysis of keywords were used to identify and recommend research directions. One theme of EEDC research, involving 11 articles, addressed a controversy about whether EEDC exposure induces vitellogenin and estrogen receptor mRNA expression. An additional theme for both pollutants was induction of oxidative stress, frequently evaluated through transcriptomics in mussels. Transcriptomics was the dominant omics approach, but metabolomics is emerging. The most frequently selected EEDCs were 17α ethynylestradiol (EE2, 28%), 17β estradiol (E2, 26%), and bisphenol A (BPA, 21%). From 2006 to 2024, the most common concentration of EE2 and E2 was 0.05 μg/L, representing the high end of their environmental range. Acute and chronic exposure durations were consistently selected over time for both pollutants. The most common physical types of MPs were virgin MPs (85%) and microbeads (69%), likely due to their uniformity and availability. Only 14% of EEDC studies and 41% of MPs studies evaluated co-exposures with other chemicals, microcystein, climatic factors or pathogens. To make future studies environmentally relevant, researchers should select low concentrations, chronic exposures, aged or biodegradable plastics, and co-exposures. Thus, this study provides a basis for future environmentally relevant experimental designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.