Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492697›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2026

Midwives' Physiological Approach at the Third Stage of Labour: A Scoping Review.

Elena Tarlazzi, Virginia Berini, Lorenzo Brevi, Rosalba Ferrandino, Mara Tormen, Dila Parma, Rosaria Cappadona, Simona Fumagalli, Antonella Nespoli, Giuliana Simonazzi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elena TarlazziDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-1275
Virginia BeriniPoliclinico di Sant'Orsola, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo BreviAusl Romagna_Obstetric Unit_Ambito Rimini, Rimini, Italy.
Rosalba FerrandinoCapobianco Group_Centro per la Diagnosi e Terapia Della sterilità di Coppia, Apricena, Puglia, Italy.
Mara TormenDepartment of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Dila ParmaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rosaria CappadonaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Simona FumagalliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0156-8429
Antonella NespoliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0288-667X
Giuliana SimonazziDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe third stage of labour occurs between the birth of the foetus and the expulsion of the placenta. A major complication during this stage is postpartum hemorrhage, which poses a significant concern for maternal health. To mitigate this risk, active management strategies have emerged, raising concerns about the safety of physiological management following a physiological birth. Midwives play a vital role in ensuring a safe third stage of labour by minimizing medical intervention and preventing postpartum hemorrhage. This scoping review aims to map the evidence on midwifery practices that support a physiological third stage of labour.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We retrieved articles from PUBMED, PsycINFO (via EBSCO), CINAHL (via EBSCO), LILACS, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov, Open Science Framework, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cochrane Library, and JBI.

resultsThe search yielded 2190 articles, with 1779 remaining after duplicates were removed. Screening identified 80 articles for review; 63 were excluded, resulting in 17 articles defining key findings. Two articles contributed to a theoretical framework for a physiological approach. Ten articles further discussed how midwives provide care during this stage to maintain normalcy. Three articles debated the safety of expectant management for low-risk women, while three studies also suggested new risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage.

conclusionMidwifery care during the physiological third stage of labour must balance safety and trust in the woman's body. More research is needed to assess expectant management in home births and midwifery-led units, with a focus on individual needs and the long-term impacts of a physiological approach.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricLabor Stage, ThirdMidwiferyPostpartum HemorrhageFemaleHumansPregnancymidwiferynatural childbirthparturitionprofessional practicethird labour stage

Identifiers

PMID41492697
PMCPMC13156665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.