ArticleThe Prostate2026
NOTIFICATION: RhoGDIα Downregulates Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells.
Article in The Prostate, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
notification"RhoGDIα Downregulates Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells," by Y. Zhu, C. Liu, R. Tummala, N. Nadiminty, W. Lou, and A. C. Gao, The Prostate 73, no. 15 (2013): 1614-1622, https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.22615. This Notification is for the above article, published online on 06 August 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and has been issued by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Samuel Denmeade; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. A third party reported that the cytoplasmic Pol II band and nuclear tubulin bands in Figure 4C had been duplicated. An investigation by the publisher also found that the RhoGDIα and Tubulin bands were duplicated between Figure 2D and Figure 2E. The authors responded to an inquiry by the publisher and reported that the authors used the same images in Figure 2D and 2E to show that RhoGDIa expression was knocked down by shGDI, as the same materials were used for Fig. 2E and 2D. The editors agreed with this statement and confirmed that the Pol II and tubulin bands in Figure 4C were intentionally marked with blank images and that the same blank image had been used to illustrate that Pol II and tubulin were used as loading controls for nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins, respectively. As such, the journal's investigation has determined that there are no concerns regarding the duplicated bands in Figures 2 and 4. This Notification has been agreed to in order to inform and alert readers of the investigation.
Identifiers
41492691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.