ReviewCureus2025
Physical and Emotional Interventions in Modulating Neuroplasticity: A Narrative Review of Recent Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroplasticity, the brain's capacity to adapt structurally and functionally in response to experiences, is a key factor in recovery from neurological conditions. Growing interest has focused on physical and emotional interventions as potential modulators of neuroplastic processes. A narrative review was conducted using a structured PubMed search of articles published between January 2018 and March 2023. Studies were included if they examined physical activity, emotional well-being, or cognitive training, with outcomes relevant to neuroplasticity. Publications outside these parameters, non-English studies, and case reports were excluded. Twenty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. The literature described a range of possible influences. Exercise was frequently linked with markers such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and synaptic plasticity. Emotional interventions, including stress reduction and mindfulness, were reported to have variable effects on neural adaptation. Cognitive training was discussed in relation to functional recovery in conditions such as stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Findings across studies were heterogeneous, and conclusions were limited by differences in study designs and outcome measures. Current evidence suggests that both physical and emotional interventions may influence neuroplasticity, though results are not uniform. The diversity of methodologies and measured outcomes indicates that more rigorous and standardized research is needed. While the reviewed literature points to potential benefits of physical and emotional interventions in modulating neuroplasticity, evidence remains preliminary. Further high-quality longitudinal studies are required to clarify their role in neurological rehabilitation and clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.