ReviewCureus2025
Retentive Value and Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Polyetheretherketone Clasps as an Alternative to Cobalt-Chrome Clasps for Removable Partial Dentures: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the review was to evaluate polyetheretherketone (PEEK) clasps used for removable partial dentures (RPDs) as alternatives to conventional cobalt-chrome (CoCr) clasps and assess their retentive potential and behavior in terms of resistance to cyclic fatigue for long-term use. This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023459699). An electronic search was performed independently by two examiners in PubMed/MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases for articles published in English between 2017 and 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. Initially, 92 articles were identified and subjected to screening. Among these, six articles met the eligibility criteria for further analysis. The inter-rater agreement for article selection was high (91.67% agreement, Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.83), with no exclusions based on risk of bias assessment. PEEK clasps, though generally exhibiting lower retention compared to CoCr, still met clinical standards. Factors affecting their performance included manufacturing, dimensions, and aging. While PEEK offers advantages in stress distribution and enamel wear reduction, concerns persist about its mechanical properties compared to CoCr, necessitating careful design considerations. Within the limitations of our systematic review, PEEK clasps may be a promising alternative to CoCr clasps in RPDs, potentially offering aesthetic benefits and reduced stress on abutment teeth. A global approach that analyzes both in vitro and in vivo studies is recommended to fully assess their performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.