Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492615›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Leveraging Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnostics Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Adetayo Folasole, Gideon U Noah, Benjamin Akangbe, Mercy U Omohoro, Oluwagbemisola E Elesho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial intelligence in respiratory medicine: From diagnosis to treatment and future directions.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adetayo FolasoleComputing, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA.
Gideon U NoahInternal Medicine/Center of Excellence in Inflammation, Infectious Diseases and Immunity, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA.
Benjamin AkangbePublic Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Mercy U OmohoroDepartment of Health Sciences, Kent State University Ohio, Kent, USA.
Oluwagbemisola E EleshoBiology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in oncology to enhance cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment planning. Despite this progress, uncertainty remains regarding the robustness and generalizability of current AI applications in cancer imaging and pathology. This systematic review evaluated the evidence on AI applications in cancer imaging and pathology, synthesizing findings on their effectiveness, limitations, and implications for clinical practice. The review synthesized evidence from studies evaluating AI systems in cancer imaging and pathology, focusing on diagnostic performance, clinical utility, and methodological limitations. The review found that AI consistently demonstrated strong diagnostic performance across cancer types and imaging modalities, often matching or surpassing clinician accuracy. These systems showed particular promise in early cancer detection and decision support, with potential to reduce human error and support more personalized treatment strategies. However, limitations were evident: most studies lacked real-world clinical validation, integration with genomic and multimodal patient data was weak, and underrepresentation of minority groups raised concerns about generalizability and algorithmic bias. Moreover, issues of transparency, explainability, and ethical acceptability remain unresolved. The findings suggest that AI could function as an effective triage and decision-support tool in oncology, but safe and equitable implementation requires addressing current gaps in data diversity, validation, and clinical workflow integration. Future research should prioritize prospective studies in diverse populations and settings, ensuring that AI systems can be trusted and effectively embedded into routine cancer care for older adults.

Indexed as

ai and machine learningcancercancer detectioncancer imagingdata analyticsearly detection of cancerrobotic process automationtechnology innovations in health industry

Identifiers

PMID41492615
PMCPMC12765566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.