ArticleCureus2025
Prehospital Detection of a Large Pericardial Effusion Using Screening Sonography: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pericardial effusion, although not uncommon in emergency contexts, poses detection and diagnostic challenges in prehospital and peripheral emergency settings where access to advanced imaging and specialist evaluation is limited. In its severe forms, rapid fluid accumulation may lead to cardiac tamponade, a life-threatening condition requiring immediate recognition and intervention. The clinical course is often insidious, and the progression of symptoms may easily be mistaken for other, more common pathologies, further complicating timely diagnosis. We report the case of a patient who presented twice within two days to a Basic Emergency Service with central chest pain of five days' duration, low-grade fever, and subsequently worsening dyspnea. Given the persistence and evolution of symptoms, a bedside screening ultrasound was performed, which revealed a large pericardial effusion. The patient was urgently referred to a central hospital, where the diagnosis was confirmed, and appropriate management was instituted. This case illustrates the vital function of screening ultrasound in resource-limited environments: even when definitive treatment cannot be provided locally, early identification of critical findings supports timely referral and improves patient outcomes. Furthermore, the decision to employ or omit screening echocardiography in such contexts can significantly influence clinical pathways and ultimately alter patient prognosis, emphasizing its relevance as a low-cost, rapidly deployable screening tool, while also stressing that patient outcomes may depend on the availability of a trained sonographer/radiographer capable of performing the examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.