Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41492576›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Disclosure of Conflict of Interest at a Professional Surgical Society Annual Meeting.

Brij R Chhabra, Atul K Madan, David S Tichansky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brij R ChhabraSurgery, Southern California Bariatrics, Los Angeles, USA.
Atul K MadanSurgery, Southern California Bariatrics, Los Angeles, USA.
David S TichanskySurgery, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Relationships with industry may create a potential conflict of interest (COI). Disclosure of COI is essential for integrity of educational programming. In 2013, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed the OpenPayments™ database to facilitate reporting, visibility, and accountability for US physicians. While the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) mandate disclosing relationships with industry, we sought to investigate only significant potential COIs. We hypothesize that most authors disclose significant potential COIs appropriately and those that do not disclose only have minor potential COI. Methods Payment information for authors at the 2023 SAGES meeting was extracted from the OpenPayments™ database (https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov). Authors not initially found were additionally searched via Google, LinkedIn, affiliation websites, and/or state medical board websites. National Provider Identifier (NPI) numbers were utilized to verify identities as needed. We defined significant potential COI as total payments > $10,000 for two years prior to the meeting. Authors were divided as disclosing COI (Disclosed) versus not disclosing COI (Not Disclosed), the latter including those with no mention of COI, stated "no relevant COI", or stated "no COI." Results There were 792 authors in 2023 and 296 eligible authors. The proportion of disclosed authors in 2023 was 16% (47/296); the incidence of significant potential COI was 25% (73/296). The average potential COI payment received was $104,284 but did not statistically differ between the Disclosed vs. Not Disclosed groups; however, only 49% (36/74) of authors that had potential COI were actually in the Disclosed group. The highest paid author in the Not Disclosed group received over $868,000. Conclusion The majority of authors appropriately disclosed potential COIs at the 2023 SAGES meeting. Contrary to our hypothesis, Not Disclosed authors may still have potential COIs. Disclosing the mere existence of a relationship seems insufficient as some authors received large sums of money. All presentations should include the dollar amounts for full disclosure of potential COI for future programs.

Indexed as

conflict of interestdisclosureindustry paymentresearchscientific presentations

Identifiers

PMID41492576
PMCPMC12765523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.