ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Association Between Worker's Compensation Status and Outcomes for Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluate for variation between patients undergoing surgery for lateral epicondylitis (LE) with and without worker's compensation (WC) coverage. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients, identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes, who underwent LE surgery between 2008 and 2020. Following exclusions, there were 293 operative patients for LE, 34 of whom had WC coverage. Outcomes consisted of comparing before surgery and postoperative pain level reported by patient feedback during consultations, ability to perform job duties, and retaining employment. This study also assessed clinical workflow via time to surgery. Positive outcomes included having resolution or improvement in symptoms after surgery, returning to employment completely, and the ability to perform job duties appropriately. Negative outcomes included unchanged or worsened pain, incomplete return to work, loss of employment, and revisions. Patients were evaluated after surgery at approximately 2-week, 6-week, and 3-month milestones. Results: Of the 34 WC cases, 12 (35%) had a negative outcome, whether persistent pain, reassignment to permanent and stationary employment, or loss of employment. Twenty percent of WC patients versus 3.5% of non-worker's compensation (NWC) patients had unchanged symptoms. Twenty-five percent of WC patients returned to modified duty versus 7.3% of NWC. Two WC patients and one NWC patient lost their jobs. Patients on WC were more likely to have delays in time to surgery than NWC patients. Postoperative documentation reflected persistent epicondylitis as the reason for failure of complete return to work. By the 3-month postoperative consultation, 3% of patients without WC (NWC) had negative outcomes, whereas 20% of WC patients had a negative outcome. By the final consultation, 92% of NWC patients returned to work full duty, whereas 68% of WC patients were able to return to work full duty. Conclusions: Overall, only approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing LE surgery under a WC claim returned to work within 3 months of surgery, compared to 92% without a WC claim. WC patients had more frequent delays in time to surgery versus NWC patients. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.