ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Untangling Sampling Bias From Lemur Dietary Specialization.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Untangling Sampling Bias From Lemur Dietary Specialization.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the drivers of wildlife dietary specialization is fundamental to understanding trophic interactions and species' functional roles in their environment. However, sampling bias is pervasive in trophic interaction research, especially in biodiverse areas with cryptic species. We aim to investigate the role of sampling bias in mediating the estimated effects of functional traits on dietary specialization. Specifically, we improve estimates of observed lemur dietary richness by analyzing trait-based biases in lemur-plant ecological interactions. First, we quantified undersampling of plants and their interactions with lemurs. Next, we tested the inclusion of sampling effort on the estimated effects of trait predictors by comparing three negative binomial regression models with the following predictors: (i) five lemur traits (body mass, litter size, group size, diurnality, frugivory), (ii) sampling effort, and (iii) the five traits together with sampling effort. We then assessed the influence of sampling bias on lemur traits and considered the uncertainty of these mediation effects on general linear model predictions. Sampling effort was a better predictor of observed dietary richness than lemur traits. By accounting for sampling bias and its effects on functional traits, we can better understand the ecological roles of species in their environments and uncover critical mechanisms underlying trophic interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.